CHANDLER VS. BEECHER, JR. (FAMILY)
25-00830 · 89816 · Nevada (SCOTN/COA) · January 7, 2025
Disposition:Appeal dismissed.Other Family LawPosture Stefanie Danielle Chandler docketed an appeal on December 18, 2024 in a family-division matter involving Douglas Paul Beecher, Jr. The appeal was docketed without payment of the filing fee and without a case appeal statement. The Nevada Supreme Court, acting through the Clerk, dismissed the appeal for failure to cure those deficiencies after notice.
Key holdings
Practitioner summary
The court dismissed this appeal under NRAP 3(a)(2) for failure to comply with the docketing requirements of NRAP 3(e) and (f). On December 18, 2024, the court issued notices giving appellant 7 days to file the case appeal statement and either pay the filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 (governing proceedings in forma pauperis). Appellant did not respond, did not pay the fee, and did not file the case appeal statement. The order is a clerk's order dismissing the appeal; it reaches no merits issues.
In plain language
When someone files an appeal with the Nevada Supreme Court, they have to pay a filing fee and submit a document called a "case appeal statement" (a short form that tells the court basic information about the case being appealed). In this case, the appellant, Stefanie Danielle Chandler, filed her appeal on December 18, 2024 but did not pay the fee or submit the case appeal statement. That same day, the court sent her notices telling her she had 7 days to pay the fee (or show she qualified to proceed without paying it under a specific rule) and to file the case appeal statement. The notices warned that not paying the fee would cause her appeal to be dismissed, and not filing the statement could also lead to dismissal. According to the order, Chandler did not pay the fee, did not file the statement, and did not otherwise respond to the court's notices. Because of that, the court dismissed her appeal. The order does not address the underlying family-court dispute between Chandler and Beecher.
This summary is independently verified against the source opinion. It is an informational research aid, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision.