DITTER VS. DITTER (FAMILY)
Posture Appellant Thomas Ditter filed an unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal in a family law matter against respondent Beth Marie Ditter. The Nevada Supreme Court granted the motion under NRAP 42.
Key holdings
Practitioner summary
The Supreme Court entered a clerk's order dismissing the appeal pursuant to NRAP 42, based on appellant's unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal. The parties are to bear their own fees and costs. No substantive issues were briefed or resolved, and the order announces no rule of law.
In plain language
This is a one-page clerk's order ending an appeal before the Nevada Supreme Court reached the merits. Thomas Ditter, the person who brought the appeal, asked the court to dismiss his own appeal. The other side, Beth Marie Ditter, did not oppose that request. The court granted the request and dismissed the appeal. Each side will pay its own attorney fees and costs. Because the appeal was voluntarily withdrawn, the court did not decide any legal issues, and the underlying family-court ruling stands as it was.
This summary is independently verified against the source opinion. It is an informational research aid, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision.