F-Law
← Case library

IN RE: PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO: Z.K-M.C-H. (FAMILY)

25-49588 · 91003 · Nevada (SCOTN/COA) · November 13, 2025

Disposition:Appeal dismissed.Other Family Law

Posture Misha H. and Gregory M.C. appealed in a matter concerning the parental rights as to Z.K.-M.C.-H., a minor, with the State of Nevada, the Clark County Department of Family Services, and the minor named as respondents. On September 9, 2025, the Nevada Supreme Court entered an order directing appellants to pay the filing fee for the appeal and cautioning that noncompliance would result in dismissal.

Key holdings

- The appeal is dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee after the appellants were directed to do so and warned that noncompliance would result in dismissal.

Practitioner summary

This is a clerk's order of dismissal for failure to pay the filing fee. After a September 9, 2025 order directing appellants to pay the filing fee and warning that noncompliance would result in dismissal, appellants did not pay. The court dismissed the appeal on that basis. The order contains no merits analysis, no standard of review, and no doctrinal discussion. It does not cite any statute, rule, or case.

In plain language

This is a one-page clerk's order ending an appeal before it was ever decided on the merits. The case involves parental rights to a minor child, identified by initials to protect the child's privacy. Two appellants - Misha H. and Gregory M.C. - had filed an appeal with the Nevada Supreme Court. When someone files an appeal, they generally have to pay a filing fee. According to this order, the court told the appellants on September 9, 2025, that they needed to pay that fee, and warned them that if they did not, the appeal would be thrown out. The fee was not paid. As a result, the court dismissed the appeal without ruling on whether the underlying decision about parental rights was right or wrong. The order does not describe the lower-court ruling, the facts of the parental rights dispute, or any legal arguments. It is purely an administrative dismissal for nonpayment.

Read the full opinion →

This summary is independently verified against the source opinion. It is an informational research aid, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision.