F-Law
← Case library

MYERS VS. MYERS (CHILD SUPPORT)

91 Nev. 488, 537 P.2d 1194 (1975) · 7888 · Nevada Supreme Court · July 23, 1975

Disposition:Affirmed. ("Affirmed.")Child Support

Posture The mother appealed from a district court order reducing the divorced father's child support obligation from $220 to $170 per month per child for the period from June 15, 1975, to June 15, 1981, contending the record did not establish a change of circumstances warranting the reduction. The Nevada Supreme Court reviewed the record and affirmed.

Key holdings

- The modification of a child support obligation rests in the sound discretion of the district court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion. - The record did not reveal an abuse of discretion in reducing the father's monthly per-child support obligation.

Practitioner summary

The court reviewed a modification reducing the father's child support obligation. The appellant mother contended the record did not show a change of circumstances warranting the reduction from $220 to $170 per month per child. Reviewing for abuse of discretion as defined in Goodman v. Goodman, 68 Nev. 484, 236 P.2d 305 (1951), the court found the record did not reveal an abuse of judicial discretion and affirmed.

In plain language

In this brief appeal, a mother challenged a district court order that reduced the divorced father's child support obligation from $220 per month per child to $170 per month per child for a period running from June 1975 to June 1981. She argued that the record did not show a change of circumstances sufficient to justify the reduction. The Nevada Supreme Court reviewed the record and found no abuse of the district court's discretion. It affirmed the reduction.

Read the full opinion →

This summary is independently verified against the source opinion. It is an informational research aid, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision.