F-Law
← Case library

STOKES VS. COGAN (CHILD CUSTODY)

22-11921 · 84455 · Nevada (SCOTN/COA) · April 15, 2022

Disposition:Appeal dismissed.Custody & Relocation

Posture Seth Aaron Stokes docketed an appeal on March 30, 2022, in a child custody matter involving Tana A. Cogan, originating from the Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court Division (Hon. Michele Mercer). The appeal was docketed without payment of the requisite filing fee.

Editorial review flagged 6 item(s) at material severity. Verify against the source PDF before relying.

Key holdings

- Failure to pay the filing fee required by NRAP 3(e), or to demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24, after notice from the court warrants dismissal of the appeal under NRAP 3(a)(2).

Practitioner summary

The court dismissed the appeal under NRAP 3(a)(2) for failure to pay the filing fee required by NRAP 3(e). After docketing on March 30, 2022, the court issued a notice requiring payment within 7 days or, alternatively, a demonstration of compliance with NRAP 24 (governing proceedings in forma pauperis). The appellant neither paid nor responded. No merits issues were reached.

In plain language

This is a brief administrative order from the Nevada Supreme Court dismissing an appeal before any consideration of the merits. When someone files an appeal, court rules require payment of a filing fee (or, alternatively, a showing that the filer qualifies to proceed without paying it). In this case, the appellant did not pay the fee when the appeal was docketed. The court issued a notice the same day the appeal was docketed, giving the appellant 7 days either to pay the fee or to demonstrate compliance with the rule that allows certain litigants to proceed without prepayment. The notice warned that failure to comply would lead to dismissal. The appellant did not pay and did not respond. The court therefore dismissed the appeal. Because the dismissal is procedural, the order does not address any of the underlying child custody issues between the parties.

Read the full opinion →

This summary is independently verified against the source opinion. It is an informational research aid, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision.