Case library
Nevada family-law decisions, briefed for practice.
Practitioner summaries with key holdings, posture, disposition, and the statutes cited - up front, where you need them. Every summary links to the full opinion.
10 results for “NRS 125.240” in Divorce, Property & Alimony
DAVIDSON VS. DAVIDSON
Sep 29, 201616-30276 · 67698 · Nevada Supreme Court
Affirmed.Standard of review: Questions of statutory construction are reviewed de novo. I. Cox Constr. Co. v. CH2 Invs., LLC, 129 Nev. 139, 142, 296 P.3d 1202, 1203 (2013). Appellate jurisdiction: The Court first held that the…
FOLLETT VS. FOLLETT (FAMILY)
Apr 14, 202626-17096 · 90905-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed. ("ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.")The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's divorce-related decisions for an abuse of discretion, citing Williams v. Williams, 120 Nev. 559, 566, 97 P.3d 1124, 1129 (2004), and Davitian-Kostanian v. Kostanian,…
GIBSON VS. GIBSON
Sep 19, 202424-34631 · 87203-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed. ("ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.")The Court of Appeals reviewed a district court decision concerning divorce proceedings for abuse of discretion under Williams v. Williams, 120 Nev. 559, 566, 97 P.3d 1124, 1129 (2004), and Schwartz v. Schwartz, 126 Nev.…
SACHETTI VS. SACHETTI (FAMILY)
Apr 29, 202626-19422 · 89619-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed. ("we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.")The Court of Appeals reviewed the enforcement of an agreement-based divorce decree and an attorney-fee award. It set out the governing standards: district court decisions in divorce proceedings and on reconsideration…
EINIGER VS. DIST. CT. (EINIGER) (FAMILY)
May 22, 202525-22827 · 90055-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Petition granted. The court directed the clerk to issue a writ of mandamus instructing the district court to comply with NRS 14.015(5) by ordering the expungement of the notice of lis pendens.This is an original writ proceeding. A writ of mandamus is available to compel the performance of an act the law requires or to control a manifest abuse or an arbitrary or capricious exercise of discretion (NRS 34.160;…
IN RE: JOINT PETITION OF MCKENDRY (FAMILY)
Jul 1, 202690847-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part ("ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED in part, and DISMISS this appeal in part.").The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's decisions concerning divorce proceedings for an abuse of discretion, citing Williams v. Williams, 120 Nev. 559, 566, 97 P.3d 1124, 1129 (2004), while noting that…
POLK VS. ROWLAND
Jul 2, 202525-28834 · 86937-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Reversed and remanded ("we reverse the district court's decisions rejecting Polk's motions to enforce the decree of divorce" and "remand for further proceedings").The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's divorce-related rulings for abuse of discretion. It cited Williams v. Williams, 120 Nev. 559, 566, 97 P.3d 1124, 1129 (2004), and Schwartz v. Schwartz, 126 Nev. 87, 90,…
SASSLER VS. SASSLER
Jun 17, 202424-21011 · 87017-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed. ("ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.")The Court of Appeals reviewed the district court's alimony and property rulings for abuse of discretion, noting that decisions in divorce proceedings will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence — "that…
GRYBOWSKI VS. GRYBOWSKI
May 28, 202424-18540 · 86067-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
"ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED."Standard of review: The court reviews the denial of a motion for reconsideration for abuse of discretion, citing Saticoy Bay, LLC, Series 34 Innisbrook v. Thornburg Mortg. Sec. Tr. 2007-8, 138 Nev. 335, 343, 510 P.3d…
YU VS. YU
Apr 29, 202424-14787 · 86578-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.The Court of Appeals reviewed a post-decree order dividing and enforcing marital property. The panel resolved the appeal on jurisdictional and record-based grounds. As to Brian's challenges to the underlying 2015 decree…
Every summary is independently verified against the source opinion; summaries are informational research aids, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision. Topic groupings are derived automatically from each case’s category tag and cited statutes; a case may appear under two topics.