Case library
Nevada family-law decisions, briefed for practice.
Practitioner summaries with key holdings, posture, disposition, and the statutes cited - up front, where you need them. Every summary links to the full opinion.
4 results for “NRCP 60(b)(1)” in Other Family Law
NORMAN VS. STAMPER (FAMILY)
Jun 26, 202525-28168 · 88904-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed. ("ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.")The Court of Appeals reviewed the denial of a NRCP 60(b)(3) motion for abuse of discretion, citing Vargas v. J Morales Inc., 138 Nev. 384, 387, 510 P.3d 777, 780 (2022) ("The district court has wide discretion to grant…
LARSON VS TRAUTMAN (FAMILY)
Sep 25, 202525-41922 · 89636-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Affirmed. ("ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE")The Court of Appeals reviewed the denial of Larson's NRCP 60(b) motions for abuse of discretion, stating it will uphold the district court's decision to grant or deny an NRCP 60(b) motion if sufficient evidence in the…
MINHAS VS. GILL (FAMILY)
Jun 2, 202626-24890 · 89267-COA · Nevada (SCOTN/COA)
Reversed and remanded. ("ORDER the judgment of the district court REVERSED AND REMAND this matter to the district court for proceedings consistent with this order.")**Standard of review.** The court reviews an order denying a motion to set aside a judgment for abuse of discretion, citing *Rodriguez v. Fiesta Palms, LLC*, 134 Nev. 654, 656, 428 P.3d 255, 257 (2018). The court also…
BURTON VS. BURTON (RETIREMENT DIVISION)
Sep 27, 198399 Nev. 698, 669 P.2d 703 (1983) · 14836 · Nevada Supreme Court
Motion to remand granted; appeal remanded to the district court for consideration of the motion to modify in light of the intervening federal and state law. ("Accordingly, the motion to remand is granted.")This appeal presented a threshold jurisdictional question and a remand request arising from the post-McCarty statutory landscape. The decree, entered June 18, 1982, confirmed the respondent's military retirement…
Every summary is independently verified against the source opinion; summaries are informational research aids, not legal advice, and no substitute for reading the decision. Topic groupings are derived automatically from each case’s category tag and cited statutes; a case may appear under two topics.